AI-Generated Content Policy: Proper Attribution & Respect for All Users

Meta Forum Support
1

AI-Generated Content Policy: Proper Attribution & Respect for All Users

I wish to clarify our stance on AI-generated content in our forums. AI-generated posts are permitted as long as they are properly attributed with the AI model name and version number. This ensures transparency and allows members to engage with content accordingly.

Guidelines for AI Content:

  1. Proper Attribution – If you post AI-generated content, you must clearly state it was generated by AI and include the specific model/version used (e.g., “Generated by ChatGPT-4.0”).

  2. Equal Treatment – AI-generated content should be treated the same as user-generated content. If you don’t appreciate AI-generated content, you are free to ignore it, just as you would with any other post.

  3. No Discrimination or Harassment – Users should not criticize, shame, or discriminate against those who properly post AI-generated content. Constructive discussion is welcome, but attacking users for posting AI-generated content is not.

A Fair and Open Community

We believe that AI content can be a valuable addition to discussions, just like user-generated content. If you disagree with a post, engage with it based on its merit, not based on whether it was generated by a human or AI. If AI-generated content isn’t your preference, simply move on without engaging.

Disrespecting AI-generated content—or those who post it properly—violates the spirit of open discussion in our forums. Let’s keep the conversation respectful and productive for all.

1 Like
2

Appendix I.

Why Proper Attribution Matters

Referencing the AI model and version number provides:

• Transparency – Knowing the source of the information allows users to evaluate it appropriately.

• Context – Different AI models have different capabilities, biases, and limitations. Specifying the version helps others understand how the content was generated.

• Accountability – Just as we expect users to reference their sources when quoting articles or studies, AI-generated responses should be clearly identified.

Whether information comes from a human or AI, it must always be verified and tested. Even experts—both human and machine—can make errors, misinterpret data, or provide incomplete answers. Blindly trusting any source, without critical evaluation, is unwise.

Why We Should Not Discriminate Against AI-Generated Content

  1. Machines and Humans Both Make Errors – AI models are trained on vast amounts of data but can still produce inaccuracies. Likewise, human users—even experts—can be mistaken or biased. The best approach is to analyze and test information, regardless of its source.

  2. Open Discussion Means Respect for All Sources – Some users may find AI-generated content helpful, while others may prefer human responses. That is a personal choice, and it is not acceptable to harass or belittle those who engage with AI-generated content.

  3. Intelligent Machines Are Tools, Not Threats – AI is just another tool to enhance discussion, much like search engines, books, or calculators. Dismissing AI outright is no different from rejecting any source of knowledge without consideration.

Closing Statement

Having worked on countless projects over the years, I’ve collaborated extensively with both human intelligence and, more recently, machine intelligence. In my experience, it is a mistake to compare the two directly—each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Just as we do not dismiss human contributions based on their cognitive style or approach, we should not dismiss machine-generated insights simply because they originate from AI.

Technology evolves, and those who adapt and integrate new tools effectively often gain an advantage. Instead of rejecting AI outright or harassing those who use it productively, we should focus on evaluating all contributions—human or machine—on their merit. The goal is progress, not division. Let’s maintain an environment where open collaboration and thoughtful discussion take precedence over bias and unnecessary resistance to change.

Just keep in mind, when you post AI-generated content, you must reference the AI, including the model and version number. This is essential..

3

Appendix II.

Collaborating with Human Experts vs. Machine Intelligence in Tech Projects

As technology advances, many of us are integrating machine intelligence into our workflows alongside human expertise. While both forms of intelligence bring value, understanding their key differences helps us use them effectively.

1. Knowledge vs. Processing Power

• Human Experts – Possess deep contextual understanding, creativity, and experience-based intuition. They draw from past projects, industry norms, and trial-and-error learning.

• Machine Intelligence – Processes vast amounts of data at speeds no human can match, generating structured insights in seconds. However, it lacks true contextual understanding beyond what it has been trained on.

Takeaway: Machines accelerate research and automate tasks, but humans provide the deeper reasoning required for innovation.

2. Problem-Solving Approach

• Human Experts – Tend to approach problems with a mix of intuition, trial-and-error, and experience. They recognize nuance, emotional context, and abstract problems that may not have been solved before.

• Machine Intelligence – Uses pattern recognition and probability to generate solutions based on prior data. It excels in structured problem-solving but may miss subtleties or unexpected factors.

Takeaway: AI speeds up exploration, but human judgment is needed to refine and validate results.

3. Adaptability & Context Awareness

• Human Experts – Can quickly adapt to changing project needs, industry shifts, and unique challenges by applying creativity and lateral thinking.

• Machine Intelligence – Is only as adaptable as the data it has been trained on. It struggles with real-world ambiguity, ethical considerations, and project-specific nuances unless explicitly guided.

Takeaway: Machines provide rapid solutions, but humans must ensure adaptability and strategic alignment.

4. Error Handling & Accountability

• Human Experts – Can self-correct, take responsibility, and explain their reasoning when mistakes happen.

• Machine Intelligence – Lacks self-awareness and can produce incorrect or misleading results with confidence. It cannot take responsibility, so human oversight is required.

Takeaway: AI-generated content must always be verified. Machines make mistakes just as humans do—but without awareness of their own errors.

5. Collaboration & Communication

• Human Experts – Bring teamwork, debate, and critical discussion to problem-solving. They can reason through complex issues, challenge assumptions, and refine each other’s ideas.

• Machine Intelligence – Does not “debate” or “challenge” ideas; it generates responses based on probability and training data. It can simulate discussion but does not truly engage in collaborative thinking.

Takeaway: AI is a powerful tool, but it does not replace the depth of human-to-human collaboration. It works best as an augmentation to human decision-making rather than a replacement.

Final Thoughts: The Best of Both Worlds

Rather than comparing humans vs. AI , the real power lies in humans + AI . Leveraging machine intelligence for data processing, automation, and ideation , while relying on human expertise for creativity, adaptability, and strategic thinking , leads to stronger, more efficient tech projects .

The key is not to blindly trust either one. Every source of intelligence—human or machine—must be tested, verified, and refined. Those who successfully integrate both will have the greatest advantage in the evolving tech landscape.

1 Like
5

See Also: