ZFS Raidz not redundant?

My ZFS on debian media server just died in a power outage, the zpool status shows this:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 corrupted data
sda ONLINE 0 0 0
sdb ONLINE 0 0 0
sdf ONLINE 0 0 0
sdh ONLINE 0 0 0
sdi ONLINE 0 0 0
sdk ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0
sdc ONLINE 0 0 0
sdd ONLINE 0 0 0
sde ONLINE 0 0 0
sdg ONLINE 0 0 0
sdj ONLINE 0 0 0
sdl UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open

how come it failed with only one drive failure??

To keep the forums high quality for all users, please take the time to format your posts correctly.

First of all, use Code Tags when you post any code or data samples so others can easily read your code. You can easily do this by highlighting your code and then clicking on the # in the editing menu. (You can also type code tags

```text
 and 
```

by hand.)

Second, avoid adding color or different fonts and font size to your posts. Selective use of color to highlight a single word or phrase can be useful at times, but using color, in general, makes the forums harder to read, especially bright colors like red.

Third, be careful when you cut-and-paste, edit any odd characters and make sure all links are working property.

Thank You.

The UNIX and Linux Forums

That's odd. RAID-Z should be redundant -- it's essentially RAID 5.