Dear,
I hope you all will be ok.
I have an issue with Solaris box running on x86 Blade.
I am unable to ping a node neither traceroute. I am able to do traceroute from oce0:6 port which have IP and subnet of same type which oce0:1 has.
details are as follows:
Problem:
root@rinams02:/# traceroute 10.128.1.35
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 10.128.5.6 @ oce0:1
traceroute to 10.128.1.35 (10.128.1.35), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.056 ms 0.927 ms 0.784 ms
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.405 ms 0.419 ms 0.272 ms
3 * * *
4 ^C
root@rinams02:/# traceroute -i oce0:6 10.128.1.35
traceroute to 10.128.1.35 (10.128.1.35), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.288 ms 1.206 ms 1.568 ms
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.382 ms 0.373 ms 0.385 ms
3 10.128.1.28 (10.128.1.28) 0.679 ms 0.486 ms 0.427 ms
4 10.128.1.35 (10.128.1.35) 0.385 ms 0.279 ms 0.323 ms
root@rinams02:/# traceroute 10.128.1.36
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 10.128.5.6 @ oce0:1
traceroute to 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.067 ms 0.784 ms 0.751 ms
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.363 ms 0.354 ms 0.282 ms
3 * * *
4 ^C
root@rinams02:/# traceroute -i oce0:6 10.128.1.36
traceroute to 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.236 ms 0.833 ms 0.691 ms
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.337 ms 0.273 ms 0.303 ms
3 10.128.1.28 (10.128.1.28) 0.645 ms 0.503 ms 0.486 ms
4 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36) 0.219 ms 0.184 ms 0.194 ms
Similar behaviour is seen when doing ssh adding -b 10.128.5.7 (which is OSS VIP) to the node instead of just ssh user@node
Thanks in advance for any hint on this.
netstat -rn
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
������� ������� �� �� ���- ���
default 10.128.5.1 UG 1 17169
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.6 U 1 19141 oce0:1
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.10 U 1 0 oce0:2
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.9 U 1 0 oce0:3
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.8 U 1 0 oce0:4
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.11 U 1 0 oce0:5
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.7 U 1 0 oce0:6
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.6 U 1 0 oce0
10.128.5.0 10.128.5.6 U 1 1 oce9
10.128.5.5 200.200.200.15 UGH 1 1
192.168.100.0 192.168.100.35 U 1 1350595 oce2:1
192.168.100.0 192.168.100.35 U 1 0 oce2
192.168.100.0 192.168.100.35 U 1 1350390 oce11
192.168.128.0 192.168.128.6 U 1 24 oce3
192.168.128.0 192.168.128.5 U 1 0 oce3:1
192.168.128.0 192.168.128.4 U 1 0 oce3:2
200.200.200.0 200.200.200.35 U 1 1 oce10
224.0.0.0 10.128.5.6 U 1 0 oce0:1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 122 2553507 lo0
ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
oce0: flags=9040843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.14 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
groupname pub_mnic
ether 78:ac:c0:f7:47:4
oce0:1: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.6 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce0:2: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.10 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce0:3: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.9 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce0:4: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.8 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce0:5: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.11 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce0:6: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.128.5.7 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
oce2: flags=9040843 mtu 1500 index 5
inet 192.168.100.36 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 192.168.100.127
groupname stor_mnic
ether 78:ac:c0:f7:47:5
oce2:1: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 5
inet 192.168.100.35 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 192.168.100.127
oce3: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 6
inet 192.168.128.6 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.128.63
ether 78:ac:c0:f7:47:9
oce3:1: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 6
inet 192.168.128.5 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.128.63
oce3:2: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 6
inet 192.168.128.4 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.128.63
oce9: flags=9040843 mtu 1500 index 7
inet 10.128.5.15 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.128.5.31
groupname pub_mnic
ether 78:ac:c0:f7:47:10
oce10: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 3
inet 200.200.200.35 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 200.200.200.255
ether 78:ac:c0:f7:47:d
oce11: flags=9040843 mtu 1500 index 4
inet 192.168.100.37 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 192.168.100.127
groupname stor_mnic
root@rinams02:/# cat /etc/netmasks
#
# The netmasks file associates Internet Protocol (IP) address
# masks with IP network numbers.
#
# network-number netmask
#
# 128.32.0.0 255.255.255.0
#
10.128.5.0 255.255.255.224
192.168.100.0 255.255.255.128
200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0
192.168.128.0 255.255.255.192
root@rinams02:/# cat /etc/hostname*
10.128.5.14 netmask + broadcast + deprecated -failover up \
addif 10.128.5.6 netmask + broadcast + up
200.200.200.35
192.168.100.37 netmask + broadcast + deprecated -failover up
192.168.100.36 netmask + broadcast + deprecated -failover up \
addif 192.168.100.35 netmask + broadcast + up
rinams02-bkp
10.128.5.15 netmask + broadcast + deprecated -failover up
root@rinams02:/# cat /etc/hostname*
hostname.oce0 hostname.oce11 hostname.oce3
hostname.oce10 hostname.oce2 hostname.oce9
root@rinams02:/# cat /etc/hostname.oce0
10.128.5.14 netmask + broadcast + deprecated -failover up \
addif 10.128.5.6 netmask + broadcast + up
eshlkhn@rinams02> ping 10.128.20.2
10.128.20.2 is alive
eshlkhn@rinams02> ping 10.128.3.1
10.128.3.1 is alive
eshlkhn@rinams02> ping 10.128.3.133
10.128.3.133 is alive
eshlkhn@rinams02> ping 10.128.3.132
10.128.3.132 is alive
eshlkhn@rinams02> ping 10.128.3.11
10.128.3.11 is alive
eshlkhn@rinams02> traceroute 10.128.3.11
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 10.128.5.6 @ oce0:1
traceroute to 10.128.3.11 (10.128.3.11), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.085 ms 0.944 ms 0.617 ms
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.264 ms 0.336 ms 0.245 ms
3 10.128.3.11 (10.128.3.11) 1.278 ms 2.171 ms 2.125 ms
root@rinams02:/# ping -I oce0:6 10.128.1.36
ping: bad interval: oce0:6
root@rinams02:/#
root@rinams02:/# ping -i oce0:6 10.128.1.36
^C
root@rinams02:/# traceroute -l -s 10.128.5.6 10.128.1.36
traceroute to 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36) from 10.128.5.6, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 0.990 ms (ttl=64) 1.018 ms (ttl=64) 0.722 ms (ttl=64)
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.406 ms (ttl=254) 0.373 ms (ttl=254) 0.354 ms (ttl=254)
3 ^C
root@rinams02:/# traceroute -l -s 10.128.5.7 10.128.1.36
traceroute to 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36) from 10.128.5.7, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.128.5.29 (10.128.5.29) 1.293 ms (ttl=64) 0.861 ms (ttl=64) 0.534 ms (ttl=64)
2 10.128.5.194 (10.128.5.194) 0.301 ms (ttl=254) 0.300 ms (ttl=254) 0.294 ms (ttl=254)
3 10.128.1.28 (10.128.1.28) 0.621 ms (ttl=62) 0.456 ms (ttl=62) 0.346 ms (ttl=62)
4 10.128.1.36 (10.128.1.36) 0.328 ms (ttl=61) 0.224 ms (ttl=61) 0.207 ms (ttl=61)
root@rinams02:/#
root@rinams02:/#
root@rinams02:/# ping -l oce0:6 10.128.1.36
ping: bad timeout: 10.128.1.36
root@rinams02:/# ping -i oce0:6 10.128.1.36
^C
root@rinams02:/# ping -i 10.128.5.7 10.128.1.36
^C
root@rinams02:/# ping -I oce0:6 10.128.1.36
ping: bad interval: oce0:6
root@rinams02:/# ping -I oce0:1 10.128.1.36i
ping: bad interval: oce0:1
root@rinams02:/#
root@rinams02:/#
Please advise what I can do on this or way forward.