I deleted a filesystem and I create a new one to install some software but when I type lsvg -l rootvg all my filesystems has mirror unless the new one.
My question is I can mirror this fs only ??? or I have to unbreak the mirror and then mirror again all the volume group (rootvg). and I can do online ?? I dont need to restart my partition
you created a lv but forgot to tell it that it shoud consist of two mirror copies. If the unmirrored lv is located on one disk only you could mirror the lv in a two disk VG easily with
$ lsvg rootvg
VOLUME GROUP: rootvg VG IDENTIFIER: 0009d1540000d6000000010955099d8c
VG STATE: active PP SIZE: 128 megabyte(s)
VG PERMISSION: read/write TOTAL PPs: 1092 (139776 megabytes)
MAX LVs: 256 FREE PPs: 730 (93440 megabytes)
LVs: 12 USED PPs: 362 (46336 megabytes)
OPEN LVs: 11 QUORUM: 1
TOTAL PVs: 2 VG DESCRIPTORS: 3
STALE PVs: 0 STALE PPs: 0
ACTIVE PVs: 2 AUTO ON: yes
MAX PPs per VG: 32512
MAX PPs per PV: 1016 MAX PVs: 32
LTG size (Dynamic): 256 kilobyte(s) AUTO SYNC: no
HOT SPARE: no BB POLICY: relocatable
right, your lv 80 PP big, is located on one disk. Use
# lslv -l Processlv
to find out on which disk the LV is. Let us assume that it is placed on hdisk0 in your two disk rootvg. So it needs to be mirrored to the other, the second disk in rootvg assumedly hdisk1.
Are you concerned because of the "low" percentage value? Well, that is just an indicator how good your LV matches its position on the disk according to its definition. E.g. AIX uses ranges on disks: edge-middle-center-inner_middle-inner_edge with a preference to use center and middle areas first (to reduce movement of read-write heads). If you define that an LV has to be placed in center and all PP fit in there you get the 100%. If some or all PP in center area are taken already your LV goes somewhere else and the percent value is getting smaller.
With SAN storage this is of no interest. It may be of interest on SCSI disks e.g. in most cases for reasons of performance. One can change the LV's properties with chlv and run a reorgvg to make it look "nicer" but as long as the LV's location on the local disks does not impact performance in a bad way I'd just leave it alone.
Sorry, lo-lp-kl, but this really takes the biscuit: what is ununderstandable in an error message which lists the reason of why and how a command failed with painful clearness?
You have a (one or more) mirrored LV, which properties perhaps say "each copy on a separate disk" (which makes sense, because two copies of one LP on the same disk would both be lost once the disk fails) and one of these disks does not have enough free PPs to increase the LV in size. Install an additional disk (or instead change the disk for a bigger one), add it to the VG (see "man extendvg"), and try again.
On a personal note: PLEASE read a bit about the Logical Volume Manager and try to understand its concepts. Everybody, regardless of knowledge or experience, is welcome here and indeed we are gladly trying to accomodate even the most "newbiest" of newbies but asking the equivalent of "what does 'disk full' mean" is supposedly slightly overdoing it.